I hope you enjoy reading this blog post. If you want my team to just do your marketing for you, click here.
I hope you enjoy reading this blog post. If you want my team to just do your marketing for you, click here.
Author: Jeremy Haynes | founder of Megalodon Marketing.
Earnings Disclaimer: You have a .1% probability of hitting million-dollar months according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. As stated by law, we can not and do not make any guarantees about your own ability to get results or earn any money with our ideas, information, programs, or strategies. We don’t know you, and besides, your results in life are up to you. We’re here to help by giving you our greatest strategies to move you forward, faster. However, nothing on this page or any of our websites or emails is a promise or guarantee of future earnings. Any financial numbers referenced here, or on any of our sites or emails, are simply estimates or projections or past results, and should not be considered exact, actual, or as a promise of potential earnings – all numbers are illustrative only.
Look, I need to be straight with you about something most people won’t admit: paid advertising is literally gambling. That’s all it is.
But here’s the thing. When you develop a proper edge, it becomes a calculated risk with higher probabilities of returning your cash. The problem is most of you are sitting in one of two buckets right now, and neither one is helping you move forward.
First bucket: You’ve organically hit a certain revenue level. You’ve dabbled in paid advertising, and every time you try it, it doesn’t work the way you expected. So you keep reverting back to organic, which gives you inconsistency, lack of predictability, and limited control.
Second bucket: You’re running paid ads but spending nowhere near what you could be. Even when things are working, you’re not pressing the gas hard enough to experience the lessons that come at every new spending level.
Here’s what you need to understand. Every new level of spend creates a dramatically different set of probabilities. The dynamics between spending less and spending more are completely different. In my experience, most operators are just paid advertising dabblers, and that’s exactly why they stay stuck.
If you want to learn more about building advertising systems that create compounded advantages, check out my 7-week live comprehensive training where I walk through the complete framework.
When I say advertising is gambling, I mean it requires the same mathematical approach professional gamblers use. Think about the professional who makes their living playing baccarat in Vegas. They’re not just throwing money around. They’re betting uncomfortable amounts because those bet sizes dramatically increase their edge against the house.
According to research from the Harvard Business Review, one of the primary reasons businesses fail to scale is premature scaling without understanding the underlying economics. The same applies to your advertising. You need to develop multiple edges that compound on each other.
Ad strategies make up your first edge. This includes how you set campaigns up, your budget strategies, and what you optimize for. I’ve seen advertisers optimize campaigns for link clicks when they should be optimizing for high-quality standard events based on direct response objectives. I audited one account where the advertiser wasn’t using headlines or primary text, and they were optimizing for the wrong standard events entirely.
Messaging is a subcategory that deserves its own attention. I talk to people trying to reach financially well-off individuals, but every hook they use talks about quitting a 9-to-5. Financially well-off people who work jobs often don’t want to quit. They want additional income streams. When you fix that messaging difference, you see a dramatically different quality of person coming through.
Your funnel strategies stack and compound with your ad strategies. That’s what we’re looking for: a compounded edge, not just one thing giving us an advantage.
Most of you sell through sales teams. Some of you might be selling through webinars at various price points, but eventually you’ll probably need a sales team too. The value your sales team brings for increasing your probability of success is tremendous. With a poorly trained sales team, you dramatically lower your probabilities.
Your staff matters too: your marketing team, your advertisers, your consultants. All of it compounds your edge. According to McKinsey’s research on marketing effectiveness, companies that align their marketing and sales functions see significantly better outcomes than those operating in silos.
Follow-up systems create another layer of advantage. This includes your marketing automation, your emails, your text stack—whether salespeople are sending things autonomously or manually, whether they’re sending selfie videos, and whether you’re using different messaging formats across platforms.
Here’s where most people get it completely wrong: budget affects edge.
When you spend a small amount of money, your cost to acquire a customer tends to be lower because you’re barely spending anything. If I’m in a fresh ad account spending minimally and I can generate qualified calls, my cost per customer is going to be relatively low.
Now compare the operator spending significantly more monthly at a lower efficiency ratio versus the operator with a higher efficiency ratio but spending minimally. The deficit becomes clear when you look at total profit dollars rather than just ratios.
The appeal of maintaining high efficiency ratios is commonly held by people at the bottom of the game spending minimal amounts. In my experience, larger operators focus on total profit dollars while putting up significant monthly spend because they’re pocketing substantially more in absolute terms.
Most small-level advertisers never do the math. They’re playing the flip game but pulling out the profit they need to reinvest to get the next flip bigger. That’s why you stay stuck at small levels.
Larger operators take that profit and reinvest it the next month. They try to increase their monthly ad spend and see if it holds. They don’t freak out when efficiency diminishes a little bit. Instead, they identify bottlenecks within their advertising and sales process and see which statistic is most probable to improve.
Research from Gartner on marketing budget allocation shows that companies investing in integrated marketing technology and consistent budget allocation outperform those with fragmented, inconsistent spending patterns.
Here’s the reality: efficiency metrics change at scale, and that’s expected. Even if costs increase, you can still be acquiring customers profitably, especially when you have backend offers and lifetime value considerations.
This conditioning sets in for people when they start to scale. You think you can maintain those initial efficiency metrics forever. That’s an illusion that happens at small-fry levels of ad spend.
Here’s how it looks: You start to scale a little bit, then you see costs slip and think you need to pull back and optimize. Then you try to scale again, costs slip, and you pull back again. You’re in this constant cycle of expand, contract, expand, contract. You never grow.
Compare that to how I approach this with clients. We’re making more, spending more, costs go up, we optimize, but we’re still spending more to make more. We’re still scaling while optimizing along the way. It’s constantly up and to the right.
Even though efficiency diminishes, we’re doing the math. I would prefer lower efficiency at significant spend versus high efficiency at minimal spend comparatively.
The comfort factor matters here. You need a level of comfort when you walk into this gamble. There’s a level of comfort when you approach advertising thinking you’ve got a certain amount to test with. If you lose it, you lose it. It’s not going to financially ruin you, but if it works, great.
That’s the perspective you want with advertising, but you also need to take the math side seriously. You want to act like the professional gambler who’s aware of the probabilities, who doubles down when appropriate and reduces risk when it’s not.
It can’t ever be an overleveraged amount of money where the flip has to work out. I recently had someone apply for our flagship program who was overleveraged going into Q4. The investment was too much for him because he was comparing it to ad spend he felt he needed to deploy instead.
Results are not typical. Your results will vary and depend entirely on your individual capacity, business experience, expertise, and level of desire. There are no guarantees concerning the level of success you may experience. The testimonials and examples used are not intended to represent or guarantee that anyone will achieve the same or similar results. We don’t believe in get-rich-quick programs. We believe in hard work, adding value and serving others. As stated by law, we can not and do not make any guarantees about your own ability to get results or earn any money with our information, courses, programs, or strategies.
We declined because he was overleveraged and in a high-pressure situation. If he had worked with us, he could have stacked all these edges: better strategies, better messaging, better targeting, better funnel strategies, better staff training, and better follow-up systems. We could have developed a financial model to make him more comfortable with the approach he was choosing to take.
Scarcity creates a survival-mode mindset. Everybody who’s built wealth has experienced scarcity mindset before. You know when you’ve overleveraged yourself on a bet. You know when you’re not thinking clearly because the bet has to work out. That’s why comfort is the foundation to everything else.
When you look at advertising from the perspective of gambling and you specifically define whether you have an edge in particular areas, and you compound all these things to culminate in a higher probability of generating returns, that’s where it becomes worth it. That’s where it becomes easier to spend significant money.
But you have to be aware of how the game works. Imagine sitting down to play Monopoly against someone who knows every rule inside and out. They know all the tricks, all the loopholes, all the probabilities. You sit down just to have fun, and someone casually explains the game to you in 30 seconds.
What do you think the odds are that you’ll beat the player who knows every rule?
When you’re advertising, you’re competing against other people. You’re competing for reach. You’re in an auction system, literally bidding your dollars against someone else to out-compete them to reach ideal customers and convert them first.
You have to know the game and figure out how it works.
Here’s a basic lesson on how the game works: A new ad account typically has spending limits. There are things you can do to speed that up: verifying a business manager, making sure every charge goes through successfully, and ensuring no ads get disapproved.
When you’re only spending minimally and you can still generate qualified calls or leads and convert customers, your cost per acquiring customer is going to be relatively low. But that’s an illusion that keeps small operators small.
The businesses I’ve worked with that have scaled understand this mathematical reality. They’re not trying to maintain unrealistic efficiency metrics at scale. They’re focused on total profit dollars, not just return ratios.
Your task after reading this is to figure out your edges. Are you like the person who walks into the casino willing to lose a certain amount and chalk it up as having fun? Or do you want to be aware of every single edge you could have and develop each one as strongly as possible?
Do you know how the game works? If you don’t, you’re getting swept by competitors who know every rule, every loophole, every probability.
The difference between staying at your current level and moving to the next comes down to understanding these principles and having the comfort level to execute on them consistently.
If you want to go deeper on building these compounded advantages in your advertising, check out my 7-week live comprehensive training or apply for the Inner Circle if you’re ready for direct implementation support.
Results are not typical. Your results will vary and depend entirely on your individual capacity, business experience, expertise, and level of desire. There are no guarantees concerning the level of success you may experience. The testimonials and examples used are not intended to represent or guarantee that anyone will achieve the same or similar results. We don’t believe in get-rich-quick programs. We believe in hard work, adding value and serving others. As stated by law, we can not and do not make any guarantees about your own ability to get results or earn any money with our information, courses, programs, or strategies.
Watch the video:
Jeremy Haynes is the founder of Megalodon Marketing. He is considered one of the top digital marketers and has the results to back it up. Jeremy has consistently demonstrated his expertise whether it be through his content advertising “propaganda” strategies that are originated by him, as well as his funnel and direct response marketing strategies. He’s trusted by the biggest names in the industries his agency works in and by over 4,000+ paid students that learn how to become better digital marketers and agency owners through his education products.
Jeremy Haynes is the founder of Megalodon Marketing. He is considered one of the top digital marketers and has the results to back it up. Jeremy has consistently demonstrated his expertise whether it be through his content advertising “propaganda” strategies that are originated by him, as well as his funnel and direct response marketing strategies. He’s trusted by the biggest names in the industries his agency works in and by over 4,000+ paid students that learn how to become better digital marketers and agency owners through his education products.
This site is not a part of the Facebook website or Facebook Inc.
This site is NOT /endorsed by Facebook in any way. FACEBOOK is a trademark of FACEBOOK, Inc.
We don’t believe in get-rich-quick programs or short cuts. We believe in hard work, adding value and serving others. And that’s what our programs and information we share are designed to help you do. As stated by law, we can not and do not make any guarantees about your own ability to get results or earn any money with our ideas, information, programs or strategies. We don’t know you and, besides, your results in life are up to you. Agreed? We’re here to help by giving you our greatest strategies to move you forward, faster. However, nothing on this page or any of our websites or emails is a promise or guarantee of future earnings. Any financial numbers referenced here, or on any of our sites or emails, are simply estimates or projections or past results, and should not be considered exact, actual or as a promise of potential earnings – all numbers are illustrative only.
Results may vary and testimonials are not claimed to represent typical results. All testimonials are real. These results are meant as a showcase of what the best, most motivated and driven clients have done and should not be taken as average or typical results.
You should perform your own due diligence and use your own best judgment prior to making any investment decision pertaining to your business. By virtue of visiting this site or interacting with any portion of this site, you agree that you’re fully responsible for the investments you make and any outcomes that may result.
Do you have questions? Please email [email protected]
Call or Text (305) 704-0094