Jeremy Haynes Breaks Down How 40 Businesses Hit Million Dollar Months With Call Funnels and Monthly Webinars

Earnings Disclaimer: You have a .1% probability of hitting million-dollar months according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. As stated by law, we can not and do not make any guarantees about your own ability to get results or earn any money with our ideas, information, programs, or strategies. We don’t know you, and besides, your results in life are up to you. We’re here to help by giving you our greatest strategies to move you forward, faster. However, nothing on this page or any of our websites or emails is a promise or guarantee of future earnings. Any financial numbers referenced here, or on any of our sites or emails, are simply estimates or projections or past results, and should not be considered exact, actual, or as a promise of potential earnings – all numbers are illustrative only.

Haynes reveals why B and C players drive out A-level talent, how limiting beliefs killed a $300K per month real estate business, and why a $240 cost per call from webinars still crushes profitability at scale.

Jeremy Haynes has helped 40 businesses hit million dollar months. The statistical probability of reaching $10 million per year sits at 0.1% according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. But patterns emerge among the winners. They demand relentless results from themselves. They see grand visions that don’t exist yet. And they feel extremely small within their existing world, which drives them to scale aggressively. During a recent podcast appearance, Haynes broke down the funnels, the ad strategies, and the team composition that separates million dollar months from businesses stuck at a few hundred thousand.

Why Businesses That View Operating Small as Unethical Hit Million Dollar Months Faster

Most businesses hitting million dollar months share a common trait. They view operating small as unethical. One client helps people quit drinking alcohol. Their offer? $15,000 to $25,000 programs focused on cutting out alcohol entirely.

In two separate months in 2024, they hit $952,000 and $948,000. Just short of a million. They weren’t celebrating. They were pissed.

“They were so fucking pissed that they just missed that benchmark,” Haynes explained.

They finally crossed the threshold in December. This month, they’re not shooting for $1 million. They’re targeting $1.5 million. And they’re on pace to spend $450,000 in ad spend alone to get there.

The ripple effect matters to them. Out of five recent customers, one was a surgeon in Houston. Another was a cardiologist. A third was a lawyer. Think about what alcohol does to a surgeon’s hands. Shakiness. Imprecision. Now think about extending that surgeon’s career by a decade. How many lives get saved?

That perspective fuels the drive. It’s not just about money. It’s about impact. Operating small means helping fewer people. For this founder, that’s unacceptable.

Why Call Funnels With Hammer Them Content and Monthly Webinars Dominate at Seven Figures

The most common funnel for high-ticket businesses? Dead simple call funnels. Headline, VSSL or mini webinar, application with scheduling embedded. That’s it.

Some pages add an extra section or two. But most stay lean. Traffic hits the VSSL. People consume part of it. They get sold on the idea of talking. They fill out the application. Then comes the hammer them strategy.

“We just blitz people with content before the sales call,” Haynes noted.

Email sequences. Video content. Educational material. All designed to frame leads before they ever speak to a closer. The goal? Get them further along in the buying process so closers aren’t dealing with people too early in the journey.

Sales teams complain about unqualified leads. But that’s just unarticulate feedback. The real problem? Leads are too early in the process. Content between booking and closing solves that.

The second major funnel? Monthly webinars. Not weekly. Monthly. Weekly webinars don’t generate the same hype or show rates.

One client teaches people how to buy businesses. They ran a recent webinar that generated 19,000 registrants. About 10,000 from paid traffic at $115,000 in ad spend. Another 9,000 from organic.

The webinar maxed out Zoom’s attendee limit at 5,000. Hundreds more emailed saying they couldn’t get in. The team sent out a replay immediately and captured those stragglers.

Cost per qualified call? $240. Compared to $62 from the VSSL funnel running simultaneously. Higher cost per call. But webinar leads show up at higher rates and close at higher percentages.

That webinar will generate at least $1.5 million in cash collected for the month. Possibly $2 million. All from one event promoted for two weeks.

How Limiting Beliefs About Market Size and Team Capacity Kill Growth at Three Hundred Thousand per Month

Haynes recently joined a call with a new Inner Circle member doing $200,000 to $300,000 per month. They sell a $15,000 offer to real estate agents who’ve participated in MLM structures. Their target market? 10,000 people.

Haynes asked the obvious question. What about the other 3 million real estate agents in the United States?

“They sat there and over-articulated for ten minutes why they’d never sell to that niche,” Haynes said.

They’d never tried. They just made it up. They also believed they could never scale past six closers. When Haynes asked if they’d ever had six closers, the answer was no. They’d tried four closers once. Two fell off within a month.

So they’re sitting at two closers with limiting beliefs about market size and team capacity. Both invented. Neither tested.

That’s the pattern Haynes sees repeatedly. Businesses blame cost per call fluctuations. They blame sales team performance. But the real bottleneck? Self-imposed mental constraints that have nothing to do with reality.

The most common problems businesses face when trying to scale? Not spending enough on ad spend. Not profitable enough to reinvest what they make. And randomness in their approach because nobody’s doing financial modeling.

“It’s all just financial modeling. It’s not even a projection,” Haynes explained.

Why A Players Figure Things Out Without Hand Holding While B and C Players Drive Out Top Talent

Haynes recently took on a client at ground zero. The founder had already built a business to $20 million per year in the real estate info space. Now he’s launching a new offer in a different niche.

He brought in Haynes for advertising and Josh Troy for sales. Two A-players from day one. That almost never happens.

“If and when you can get an A-player into the business, their entire teams are just a bunch of A-players,” Haynes noted.

B and C players are slow. Bureaucratic. Political. You tell them the same thing repeatedly. They need hand-holding. And when you fire them, you don’t notice they’re gone.

A-players? You point them in a direction. Give them a goal. They figure it out. They pride themselves on results, not time or effort. And when they deliver, the impact shows immediately in the data.

Haynes gave a recent example. He hired a web developer from a team in India he’d used successfully before. They staffed him with someone new. The developer repeated sections of the page. Placed buttons too close to text. Formatted text improperly.

Haynes got one-third of the way through corrections and stopped. He asked the developer to identify what was wrong without guidance. The developer found maybe one-fourth of the issues.

Haynes cut ties immediately. Hired a second A-player developer who cost more. The new developer finished the entire project in 72 hours without a single follow-up question.

B and C players drive out A-players. Look at Jimmy Butler with the Miami Heat. He’s an A-player surrounded by G-league talent. He asked for help. The Heat brought in more bench players. Now he wants out.

A-players don’t tolerate mediocrity. The illusion is you pay them more. But B and C players outnumber A-players three or four to one to accomplish the same work. You end up paying more in total payroll for worse results.

What Profit Margins Look Like When You Spend Four Fifty Thousand in Ad Spend to Hit One Point Five Million

The alcohol business spending $450,000 in ad spend this month to hit $1.5 million? Their total costs sit around $860,000. They’ll pocket roughly $550,000 to $600,000 net. That’s high 30s to low 40s profit margin.

When they did $1 million last month at $300,000 in ad spend, their costs were around $600,000. They pocketed roughly $300,000 to $350,000. Also high 30s margin.

At 30% to 40% margins, taking home half a million per month after taxes is the goal. That accumulation of resources lets founders actualize their vision faster.

Money creates instantaneousness. Without it, life moves slow. With it, things happen immediately. Internal vision becomes external reality faster. That compression of time drives founders to keep scaling.

From call funnels with hammer them content sequences to monthly webinars generating 5,000 live attendees. From firing B-players who tolerate mediocrity to hiring A-players who pride themselves on results. From breaking through limiting beliefs about market size to running financial models that reveal a $600 cost per call is still wildly profitable. The businesses hitting million dollar months aren’t doing anything magical. They’re just relentlessly executing proven systems with elite talent while refusing to accept small thinking as a permanent condition.